My Hypothesis | 你的繼承者

Through four years of the observation and a year to hatch, I found a very funny thing, and I give it of conclusion be:"In a group of the equal quantity member, you can find out a inherit always before you leave this group. He will inherit your a certain characteristic, may be a qualities, appearance, every act or talk etc., or is a containment all."

When I attend in the university, grade one go to grade four from the university. Live dormitory I always like to sit in the restaurant of the school to enjoy my food slowly, then observe the interactive behavior of people or the behavior of the individual. (My such behavior possibility is very strange for some people.) From this observe always can probably know what kind of the person will do some and what kind of matter. Or when will meet such person in the future I know how reply. And the boy of the same kind type come out with girl's behavior also a little different. However, the human type isn't four kinds of blood types and 12 kinds of horoscopes of 48 kinds can describe. Certain personal type his(her) kind is just the "feeling" that gives to interacted at that time!

The university that I graduate probably has more than 2,000 people. Going to the school restaurant to have a meal everyday probably 500-1,000 people are or so! People the time of the breakfast is the least and the majority are to bought and then walk; The time of the lunch is the most, the restaurant position usually isn't enough to use; 1/3 of the number that the person of the dinner probably only has the lunch time at school and will there were a group of student who attends to study a department. I probably everyday will go once at least to the restaurant, and is not necessarily which meal.

Observe under this condition, I find this "condition" of "the individual inherit" also is accident. Although isn't like the sociology to do so exact experiment observation and have no theories to support, but such phenomenon is also very interesting.

Probably in a certain group, we are the "inherit" and inherit certain person who have already left the characteristic and come in to maintain the group characteristic. Is because of this probably, we always can say: "The teachers are like this; What to do business are thus such; The person who learns science how would; The students of this school are like this; All of this political party supporters are so......." Such as this kind of words. We always describe a certain group with the group characteristic. So the person will enter the group, his(her) characteristic usually is the type that can maintain the group characteristic. This can also explain why the group characteristic is very difficult to be changed.



當我在大學就讀時,從大學一年級到四年級,住宿舍的我總是喜歡坐在學校的餐廳裡慢慢的享用我的食物,然後觀察人們的互動行為或個體的行為。(我這樣的行為 可能對某些人來說怪怪的。)從這樣觀察裡總是可以大概知道什麼樣的人會做些什麼樣的事,或當未來遇這樣的人就知道該如何應對,而且同類型的男生跟女生表現 出來的也不太一樣。不過,人的類型不是四種血型加上十二種星座的四十八種就可以描述的,某個人的類型是給當時的互動者的一種"感覺"罷了!

我畢業的大學大概有兩千多人,每天到學校餐廳用餐的大概五百人到一千人左右吧!早餐的時候人最少,而且大多數是買了就走;午餐的時候人最多,餐廳位置常常 不敷使用;在學校吃晚餐的人大概只有午餐時刻的人數的三分之一,還會有一群就讀進修部的學生。而我在餐廳的時間大概是每天至少會去一次,而且不一定是哪一 餐。在這樣的條件下觀察,發現"個體繼承者"這個"狀況"也是意外,雖然不是像社會學家那樣嚴謹的實驗觀察,也沒有所謂的理論基礎,但是這樣的現象倒是很 有趣。

或許在某個群體裡,我們是"繼承"某個已離開的的人的特質而進來,以維持這個群體所散發的難以改變的群體特質。或許就是因為這樣,我們總是可以說:"當老 師的人就是這樣這樣;做生意的就是如此如此;學電腦的人就會怎樣怎樣;那所學校的學生就是這樣子;那個政黨的支持者都是這樣......."諸如此類的 話。我們總是以群體特質來描述某個群體,所以會進入群體的人,其特質往往就是可以維持群體特質的類型,這也可以說明為何群體特質很難改變的原因。

0 Responses